AITURK IDE 1.0.0-beta.18: gorunmeyen onay beklemesi yerine aninda "onay gerekli"

A one-shot run (hermes chat --query-file ... -Q, stdin closed, no window)
still installs the prompt_toolkit approval callback but never starts the
prompt UI. The protected instruction-file gate (AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md /
SOUL.md ...) took the registered callback for a reachable human and waited
out approvals.timeout on a panel painted nowhere. With the profile value of
300000 s the stage job hung for good.

- Gate: in a one-shot run, or when only an automatic approver
  (subagent_auto_approve) is attached, return BLOCKED / APPROVAL REQUIRED
  immediately instead of prompting. Human consent is still required every
  time; yolo and approvals.single_query_mode still do not open this gate.
- One-shot exit prints an "approval_required: {json}" line on stderr
  (session_id, tool_call_id, request_id, targets, reason, applied=false)
  so the launcher can tell "blocked, needs a human" from "still working".
- execute_code: an approval that arrives after the calling script stopped
  waiting (300 s reply timeout, script run timeout, retired kernel cell)
  is not applied.
- Same invisible wait removed from the computer_use and memory-write
  prompts in a one-shot run. The one-shot marker is no longer inherited by
  child processes.
- BLOCKED text no longer breaks on a target path containing braces.

Long-running tools are untouched: no general tool timeout was shortened.

Kart: turkservis-20261007-1421-2

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwSpve9HuXMy7dHf4RDMzX

tools/file_tools.py

@@ -861,12 +861,18 @@ def _request_protected_instruction_approval(
         "required (not bypassed by auto-approve)."
     )
     display = f"<write to {targets}>"
-    blocked = (
-        f"BLOCKED: write to protected agent-instruction file(s) ({targets}) "
-        "{why} The user has NOT consented to this write. Do NOT retry it or "
-        "attempt the same edit via another path (terminal, execute_code, "
-        "etc.)."
-    )
+    class _Blocked:
+        # Not str.format: a target path may itself contain braces.
+        @staticmethod
+        def format(why: str) -> str:
+            return (
+                "BLOCKED: write to protected agent-instruction file(s) "
+                f"({targets}) {why} The user has NOT consented to this "
+                "write. Do NOT retry it or attempt the same edit via "
+                "another path (terminal, execute_code, etc.)."
+            )
+
+    blocked = _Blocked
 
     try:
         import tools.approval as _approval
@@ -874,6 +880,41 @@ def _request_protected_instruction_approval(
         return blocked.format(why="requires approval but the approval "
                                   "subsystem is unavailable.")
 
+    def _needs_human(reason: str, why: str) -> str:
+        # No human could be shown this request. Record it so a one-shot
+        # run can hand its coordinator a machine-readable outcome, and tell
+        # the agent where a human CAN approve it instead of waiting on a
+        # prompt nobody sees.
+        try:
+            _approval.note_human_approval_required(
+                "protected_instruction_file", list(reasons), reason)
+        except Exception:
+            pass
+        return blocked.format(
+            why=why + " APPROVAL REQUIRED: a human must approve this from "
+                      "an interactive session (resume this same session in "
+                      "the desktop app or an interactive terminal and "
+                      "request the write again there).")
+
+    def _too_late() -> str | None:
+        # The approval came back after whoever issued this call stopped
+        # waiting (execute_code RPC reply timeout). The caller already saw
+        # a failure, so applying the write now would be an edit the agent
+        # believes never happened.
+        try:
+            late = _approval.approval_arrived_too_late()
+        except Exception:
+            late = False
+        if not late:
+            return None
+        logger.warning(
+            "Approval for protected instruction file(s) %s arrived after "
+            "the caller stopped waiting; write not applied.", targets)
+        return blocked.format(
+            why="was approved only after the calling script had stopped "
+                "waiting for the result, so the write was NOT applied. "
+                "The approval is spent; a new request needs a new approval.")
+
     # Gateway surface: block on the button round-trip when a notify callback
     # is registered for this session (Telegram/Discord/Slack). One-operation
     # only — no session/permanent buttons are offered.
@@ -898,14 +939,15 @@ def _request_protected_instruction_approval(
             session_key, notify_cb, approval_data, surface="gateway",
         )
         if decision.get("notify_failed"):
-            return blocked.format(
-                why="requires approval but the approval request could not "
-                    "be delivered.")
+            return _needs_human(
+                "approval_not_delivered",
+                "requires approval but the approval request could not "
+                "be delivered.")
         choice = decision.get("choice")
         if decision.get("resolved") and choice in {"once", "session", "always"}:
             # One-operation grant regardless of the tapped scope — nothing
             # is persisted for this gate.
-            return None
+            return _too_late()
         if not decision.get("resolved"):
             return blocked.format(
                 why="approval prompt timed out without a user response. "
@@ -921,6 +963,28 @@ def _request_protected_instruction_approval(
         callback = None
 
     if callback is not None:
+        # A one-shot run (``chat -q`` / ``--query-file``) installs the
+        # prompt callback but never starts the prompt UI: the panel would
+        # be painted nowhere and the wait would last the whole
+        # approvals.timeout with nobody able to answer. A registered
+        # callback is not a reachable human. Fail closed NOW;
+        # approvals.single_query_mode does not apply to this gate.
+        try:
+            unattended = _approval._is_single_query_approval_context()
+        except Exception:
+            unattended = False
+        if unattended:
+            return _needs_human(
+                "no_interactive_user",
+                "requires approval but this is a one-shot run with no "
+                "interactive user to approve it.")
+        if getattr(callback, "unattended", False):
+            # An auto-answering callback (subagent auto-approve) is not a
+            # person; this gate takes consent from a human only.
+            return _needs_human(
+                "no_interactive_user",
+                "requires approval but only an automatic approver is "
+                "attached to this run, not a person.")
         choice = _approval.prompt_dangerous_approval(
             display, description,
             allow_permanent=False,
@@ -929,7 +993,7 @@ def _request_protected_instruction_approval(
         )
         if choice in {"once", "session", "always"}:
             # One-operation grant; never persisted (see docstring).
-            return None
+            return _too_late()
         if choice == "timeout":
             return blocked.format(
                 why="approval prompt timed out without a user response. "
@@ -938,9 +1002,10 @@ def _request_protected_instruction_approval(
 
     # No human channel at all (script, cron, background thread): fail
     # closed. Auto-approving here would recreate the persistence vector.
-    return blocked.format(
-        why="requires approval but no interactive user or gateway is "
-            "present to approve it.")
+    return _needs_human(
+        "no_approval_channel",
+        "requires approval but no interactive user or gateway is "
+        "present to approve it.")
 
 
 def _check_protected_instruction_write(paths: list[str],